It’s
around two o’clock in Regan Galipeau’s second-grade
classroom, time for the math lesson. But this isn’t
some routine muttering of multiplication tables: the room
crackles with energy as kids throw up their hands, competing
to offer the “right” number. Galipeau ’00
is holding an auction and as her students bid play dollars
and cents on items like bright smiley-face stickers and a
Mickey Mouse doll, they are almost unconsciously putting skills
to work:how much money do I have and how long can I keep bidding?
Will I have the cash if something better comes along? Can
I negotiate with my neighbors and share the toy for a fraction
of the cost?
If
it’s been a few decades since you walked the halls of
elementary school, welcome to a new world where communal tables
have displaced desks, where project-based learning beats a
teacher at the blackboard and where a child’s “multiple
intelligences” are targeted every day.
It’s
a bit of a new world for Champlain, too, having just in the
last several years shifted its focus from early childhood
education to preparing undergraduates for careers teaching
kindergarten through sixth grade. But with its emphasis on
experiential learning—and strong facultystudent relationships—the
College is proving to be an ideal training ground for the
best kind of teacher: creative, empathetic, passionate.
Most
unique is that students get right to work with children—from
their second semester freshman year until they graduate.“I
admit you get taught a lot about math and literacy,”
Galipeau says,“but getting into the classroom was the
biggest thing for me. At Champlain there’s plenty of
opportunity to get in and teach what you learn.”
THE
POWER OF PLAY
It’s
just that point—that you need to act on what you learn—that
has rocked classrooms from kindergarten to college, at least
the good ones, according to Champlain Education Director Colin
Ducolon. “Kids learn through play,” he says. “We’ve
known that for a hundred years.” Educators may have
intuited that truth,but over the last few decades, science
has backed them up, clearing the way for a new style of teaching.
And if play is a hands-on, interactive exercise for kids,
then the lesson holds true for adults too. These findings
are changing not just the way we teach kids, but the way we
educate teachers as well.
“The research on young children is telling us that we
all learn best when we can do something with the information,
not just listen to it and write it on paper,” Ducolon
says. “That’s the impact [the science] has had
on education today. We know that if we want kids to understand
any concept, whatever it happens to be, we’ve got to
do something with it. So you make a project, you go out into
the community, you take pictures, you do a Power Point. I
think that’s had a tremendous effect.”
Ducolon
admits that high schools and particularly colleges have been
slow to change.The notion of a bow-tied professor lecturing
as students feverishly take notes (or nod off in the back
of the room) is deeply entrenched. But not in the classrooms
of Ducolon’s team.
“We teach in the style that we would expect students
to teach children—working in small groups for collaboration,”
he explains.“And the kinds of assessments we do are
not necessarily tests the way we took in school. They’re
more action-oriented.”A recent final exam in a social
studies course, for example, required students to choose an
article from the Burlington Free Press, analyze it and design
a lesson around it.
But
it’s the teaching time that education majors log that
makes the theory come alive. Students bring their experiences
back to the Champlain classroom where they become fodder for
discussion and the basis for self-reflection. They trade tricks
on everything from getting a class’s attention (a gentle
rain stick works better than a sharp handclap) to dealing
with difficult parents.
“That’s
probably one of the most important aspects of the education
program,” says Jessica Pettigrew ’03 (see “Student
Teacher of the Year,” page 12). “We could share
what things worked and what didn’t—and avoid making
the same mistakes we saw other teachers making. It’s
always nice to be able to go back and talk to your professor.
It lets you know that what you did was okay or at least gives
you the comfort of knowing that someone else has been through
it.”
That
feedback is crucial, says Associate Professor Paul Koulouris,
who emphasizes Champlain’s highly structured system
for supervising student teachers. In the second semester of
the senior year, when student-teaching becomes full-time,
faculty observe each individual every other week, an intense
schedule by most standards. But again, the process is more
interactive than passive. “I observe, take notes, often
videotape the lesson,”Koulouris says. “Then we
get together and talk about how it went and look at the children’s
work.We celebrate what went well and discuss areas that could
be strengthened.We do a lot of reflection.”
One
reason these exchanges are so profitable to students is the
extraordinary access they have to faculty. It’s a common
practice for full-time student teachers to call or exchange
long e-mails with their advisors in the evenings before heading
back to their classrooms the next morning. “You had
the security of knowing that someone was there for you if
you had a problem,” says Pettigrew.
ONE
CHILD AT A TIME
When
Champlain faculty work closely with students, they’re
doing more than providing support—they’re modeling
one of the most challenging tasks the young teachers will
face in the classroom. Today’s teachers are not only
expected to get to know each child, but to tailor their lessons
to meet individual needs.
“I
believe that children develop at different rates,” says
Koulouris, who has a background in developmental psychology.
“It is our responsibility to know where a child is developmentally,
cognitively and emotionally.The research shows that we need
to differentiate our instruction based on where the child
is.”
But
how does a teacher accomplish such a feat in the swirl of
special projects and pulled pigtails and mandatory standardized
tests? “You work really hard,” Koulouris answers.“You
have to be skilled in teaching and skilled in managing time.Teachers
have to make that quality time in small groups or one-on-one.
It’s just so crucial.”
In
her bustling fourth-grade classroom, with the art projects
and the plants and the geometry and biology posters that seem
to cover every surface, Jacie Knapp ’00 meets that challenge
with passion and grace. The job is made tougher by the socioeconomic
reality of the students in her school.Seventy-five percent,
she says,come from broken homes. Some come from great families,
some from families where they get little care and attention,
and some have landed in foster care.“I give them a lot
that they don’t get at home,” Knapp says. “Stability,
clear guidelines that make them feel safe, tender love and
care.”
And
she makes them feel smart. “Any kid who walks into my
room can learn and will learn. But every child has a different
way of learning,” says Knapp. She explains about her
work at Champlain on multiple intelligences, the idea that
there are different ways to demonstrate intellectual ability,
ranging from spatial to verbal and even to rhythmic or musical.
“We do math a thousand different ways,” she says,“hitting
all those intelligences to see how they learn. That drives
everything I do.”
Clearly
Knapp’s style works. In June she said good-bye to a
little boy who came into her class struggling. His parents
were splitting up; his self-esteem was low. But she looked
deeper and saw a bright and eager child. Her strategy was
not to let him get frustrated because he didn’t understand
what she said. Instead, Knapp facilitated his own discoveries.“And
he got lots of hugs,” she emphasizes. “That was
a huge piece.” Early on she had reminded him of the
story of the little engine that could. “All year,”
Knapp says,“you could hear him tell himself,‘I
think I can.’”
With
teachers like this, it seems possible that they all can. O |